{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Shadlezz:
12/20/2014 6:31:34 PM
1
You [i]aren't[/i] the forerunners. You reverse engineered their Tech.
And wait, isn't that EXACTLY what you did in the last U.N. thread?
English
-
I [i]became [/i]the Forerunners. What are you referring to in that thread?
-
If you [i]became[/i] the forerunners by reverse engineering, Then we [i]are[/i] the forerunners [i]too[/i]
-
There can only be one
-
There can be as many as we wish
-
-
There can only be one? That's exactly why we will destroy you
-
There [i]is [/i]only one
-
Yes. [i]us[/i]
-
[i]I[/i] was first
-
-
Proof?
-
Why should I give you proof? You never gave any.
-
The burden of proof is on you.
-
And I return it to you
-
*sigh* That's not how it works
-
And you know how it works?
-
You can read to your heart's content
-
Ok, but if you still haven't provided sufficient proof when [i]I[/i] asked you to, you don't have the right to put it on me again, as it is still on you.
-
No it isn't. I provided my proof. Just because you claim it is insufficient doesn't mean it is.
-
But it was insufficient
-
-
-
-
-
