{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MakeAWishKid909:
10/1/2014 12:47:43 PM
401
Serious question Here...If you could replace Activision With another Corporation what will it be?
If you could take Activision out of the creation of destiny but leave bungie in it... Who would you put in Activisions spot?
-
1 ReplyFromsoft
-
Rockstar and infinity ward aren't publishers
-
4 RepliesMicrosoft, IMO, would be the best fit due to prior experiences together and chemistry. There's a reason CoD's are pumped out annually and DLC is rarely offered after the years cycle.
-
-
3 RepliesNo wait, Bethesda, bioware, treyarch, and bungie all need to come together for destiny 2
-
Graco. So that all the babies on here would have somewhere appropriate to sit and whine.
-
Ubisoft/bresthada....I may have spelled that wrong
-
SEGA, because i'd love to hear that "Seeegaa" everytime i boot up the game. Seriously, almost anything else but EA/Activision.
-
Rocksteady FTW!
-
Microsoft... Oh, wait...
-
1 ReplyGearbox. Have Bungie focus on the PvP while Gearbox makes a campaign
-
The KKK.
-
Edited by NinjaCoby: 10/1/2014 2:28:13 PM[b]CRYTEK[/b]
-
Bethesda of course. I've never played a game that Bethesda was involved in that I disliked. Fallout for example... talk about an amazing game that has such replay value and a damn good story
-
2K for sure.
-
The KKK.
-
4 RepliesBethesda Softworks
-
Ubisoft
-
Sony, Valve, or just let Bungie do the project on their own (I still would of bought it).
-
1 ReplyEdited by MJVigs: 10/1/2014 2:00:22 PMGearbox. All the way. Makers of borderlands. Would have been perfect. Activision can go suck one.
-
Honestly, I think it would have been better if it was made by Sony or Microsoft than Activision, EA, or any other publisher. I know that Sony likes to give the developers their own space, and make sure they make a game they are happy with, instead of forcing a release when it isn't ready (like Driveclub and Order: 1886), and Microsoft is the same. Exclusivity would have been a downer for a lot of gamers, but it would have given Bungie the time they needed to fully flesh it out. My second recommendation would be 2K, because they seem to be a pretty decent publisher.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Lvcky Lvc: 10/1/2014 2:21:53 PMMy choice would be Blizzard Edit: Just read the comment about Blizzard being a subsidiary of Activision Blizzard.
-
2 RepliesInfinity Ward is a developer, not a publisher. Rockstar is also a developer (I think, I don't follow then closely) I'd go Microsoft. Microsoft gave them freedom so long as they both knew what game was being made.
-
4 RepliesBioware I know they flopped at the end of mass effect 3 but man that was an anaIng series
-
Squarenix
-
I see a lot of people saying "Bioware" Bioware is a developer, they do not publish games...do you know who does publish their games? EA...
