JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
Edited by Bistromathics: 4/13/2014 5:42:07 PM
19

"Capitalism simply isn't working"

[url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/12/capitalism-isnt-working-thomas-piketty]Guardian article on a new and slightly controversial book from French economist Thomas Piketty.[/url] [quote]...Piketty is in no doubt, as he indicates in an interview in today's Observer New Review, that the current level of rising wealth inequality, set to grow still further, now imperils the very future of capitalism. He has proved it. It is a startling thesis and one extraordinarily unwelcome to those who think capitalism and inequality need each other. Capitalism requires inequality of wealth, runs this right-of-centre argument, to stimulate risk-taking and effort; governments trying to stem it with taxes on wealth, capital, inheritance and property kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Thus Messrs Cameron and Osborne faithfully champion lower inheritance taxes, refuse to reshape the council tax and boast about the business-friendly low capital gains and corporation tax regime. Piketty deploys 200 years of data to prove them wrong. Capital, he argues, is blind. Once its returns – investing in anything from buy-to-let property to a new car factory – exceed the real growth of wages and output, as historically they always have done (excepting a few periods such as 1910 to 1950), then inevitably the stock of capital will rise disproportionately faster within the overall pattern of output. Wealth inequality rises exponentially.[/quote] [url=http://www.amazon.com/Capital-Twenty-First-Century-Thomas-Piketty/dp/067443000X]Capital in the Twenty-First Century[/url] is pretty much on fire right now and has brought its author into the limelight. Thomas Piketty, from the Paris School of Economics, has analyzed hundreds of years of data and come to the conclusion that massive wealth inequality is very detrimental and very inevitable in our current, capitalist structures. [url=http://www.vox.com/2014/4/8/5592198/the-short-guide-to-capital-in-the-21st-century]Here is a quick guide to the book and Piketty's arguments.[/url] [url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/may/08/thomas-piketty-new-gilded-age/]Unsurprisingly, the most thorough review of the book comes from a certain left-leaning economist.[/url]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by Gaara444: 4/21/2014 12:26:35 AM
    >Implying monopolies capture true capitalism There wouldn't be such a huge wealth inequality if people created competition before the beasts got too big. Also, what does he suggest? Socialism? Wealth is not the same as income, you can tax a man for having a factory but you can't redistribute that factory, all Socialism would do is put the factory in the hands of the government. Now people would think that would destroy the "Rich Vs. Poor" because they would be under this delusion that the government is going to do things right. Because governments have had amazing track records of always being right, right?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    1 Reply
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon