So let me get this straight: this guy is saying that since the law was designed as such as to allow you the freedom to decide to let someone die in one hypothetical scenario it should allow you that same freedom in all different scenarios? Lol. Well maybe it's different in the States, but up here in Canada we have a law that states that if you are being held at gunpoint and asked to shoot someone else to save your life, if you follow that criminal's orders and are still alive later you get arrested for murder. The hypothetical scenario is different but the intention is still clear: you are to prioritize saving someone else's life over your own. I guess that means abortion should be totally illegal in Canada, right?