{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/17/2019 2:41:40 AM
1
-
lol, fair point. We’ve both been typing lots of stuff for no reason. Heck, you even created a poll, apparently, for no reason.
-
Edited by SouLFeeS: 5/17/2019 3:20:28 AMYou know what I meant, and I’m not here to teach you anything. If you question the validity of the ground truth, fine. It’s a bit hypocritical, however, since you’re here...among them...consistently. Further, it’s the easiest argument you can make, “the respondents aren’t real”. It’s like crying voter fraud when you lose. Regardless, I stand by my numbers. EDIT: Here’s the [url=https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/252048395/0/0]poll[/url]. You should vote. Add some legitimacy.
-
Nobody likes their work debunked. You have my apologies if it hurts your feelings. There is no authenticity behind your poll to validate those numbers though. Polling is a science that only works in a very rigidly controlled environment, with very controlled respondents, data, and questions.
-
You know what I meant. I’m not here to teach you anything. If you don’t accept the validity of the ground truth, fine. Although, it’s the easiest copout to take, and is incredibly ironic, specifically since you consistently dwell among the same pool you assert is invalid. As I said. I stand by my numbers.
