{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/15/2018 12:38:38 PM
21
To those whom it may concern.
I did not care for the Harry Potter series, and by series i mean film and novels. The series as a whole is predictable and bland.
Also Emma Watson is not attractive, she's bland. She is not ugly, but she is not beautiful. She's a solid 5, perhaps the most secure 5 ever. Not a 5.1 or a 4.9, just 5.
-
Non hufflepuff detected
-
2 RepliesYaaaarrrrbbbeeeyyyy
-
7 RepliesI think she was also underage. Rating is inappropriate.
-
1 ReplyNever seen the movies or read the books, so I can't say anything either way. [spoiler]Not my choice.[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplyAgreed with you. Emma Watson is maybe a 6 for me.
-
Emma Watson is way overrated. No ass, no tits, no lips. No way, no how.
-
5 RepliesIf she's a 5, what am I?!
-
[spoiler]you have a point.[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplySuch a Slytherin thing to say.
-
4 RepliesSeries is awesome and Emma is a 10.
-
8 RepliesEdited by NorthElite: 1/16/2018 7:26:32 AMLiterally F[b]u[/b]ck [b]You[/b]. Avada kedavra BITCH
-
3 RepliesThank you for your feedback, we will make sure to pass this on to the autistic kid that likes to draw dicks on stuff.
-
3 RepliesI see you're a Ron guy, same.
-
1 ReplyBut Harry Potter is best anime
-
1 ReplyIt looks like you prefer the best cinema third wheel. Ron Weasley
-
Yeah... [spoiler]yeah.[/spoiler]
-
1 Replythe title upsets me
-
I felt the same way too.
-
3 RepliesHi, My name is Chris H and I was just looking for some clarification on your comment. Would you say that Emma is a 5 in the first movie, last, or both?
-
Well thank goodness your opinion is completely an utter false. With that in mind we thank you and will be sending your message to the department of “Shite”
-
3 RepliesI agree, Emma Watson in The Sorcer's Stone is not attractive. Mainly because she is a child.
