When Microsoft released the patch for it being backwards compatibility. For me, when the patch released, and I played a game of matchmaking, I already knew I was gonna put Halo 5 down and I've only played warzone once or twice due to 11 friends begging me to fill the last spot. But besides that, Reach has been my primary Halo game. I find it more enjoyable, balanced and overall better than Halo 5. I can however give Halo 5 credit where it's due, but besides that, I find Reach to be a better Halo game than Halo 5. So what about you guys? Anyone go back to Reach, still playing 5, or just never put down Reach in the first place.
						
					
					
				- 
   
	6 RepliesEdited by A Jackal Sniper: 10/14/2016 4:16:08 PMI go back to reach every once in a while. But then I get fed up with armor abilities and peer to peer and stop after 3 matches. And reach more balanced than 5? HAHAHA!!
- 
   
	Edited by Uuv: 10/15/2016 12:58:47 PMReach was an unbalanced mess. Halo 5's Arena is much more balanced than that game. You said Halo 5 was unbalanced, but you chose to play it's most unbalanced game mode to judge it.
- 
   
	I had a huge frame rate drop while playing Firefight on Reach last night.
- 
   
	1 ReplyEdited by fangfireskull: 10/15/2016 9:15:23 PMIsn't reach still very buggy on Xbox one? Drop in frame rates, textures snot appearing right, lag of all kinds? Or did they finally fix that and make it stable?
- 
   
	Note: posse up and go into Griffball, don't score any objectives, and wait out the time. This will net you a massive amount of credits, i.e: 10,000 per match if you're a Brigadier, 17,000 if per match you're a Noble.
- 
   
	I mean, the forge was fun
- 
   
	Reach is so bad though
- 
   
	Only came back to see if the File Browser community is still trash.
- 
   
	Ocasionallly to play some custom games
- 
   
	Yeah, to play the campaign
- 
   
	Reach is trash
- 
   
	Edited by whoops: 10/14/2016 11:23:20 AMThe only reason I played Reach was because the female Spartans had nice rear-ends
- 
   
	I've played it a few times. I always love getting to gun down mooks with the Falcon gunner turrets. My main gripe is with 343's inconsistency and blase attitude to actually making a good Halo game. Halol 4 was shit across the board in MP, campaign was good. Halol 5 was shit across the board in campaign, but MP was okay-good at times. And the horrendous art style. WHY is everything -blam!-ing plastic and shiny? WHY?! I'll also never understand the hard-on everyone seems to have for the BR. It's nowhere near as good as the Halo 2 version they added in, but it's not seen anywhere outside of customs, Forge, more casual modes, and Warzone. Don't bring up competitive. MLG is cancer.
- 
   
	Reach is full of tryhards these days. Everyone knows how to exploit maps and mechanics and abuse jetpack now. No fun. Haven't touched the game in months. 2010/2011 was the only time Reach was even somewhat enjoyable to play.
- 
   
	Couldn't find my reach disc
- 
   
	Reach was and still is my favorite halo. Will probably stay that way too, if 343's offerings are anything to go by
- 
   
	Absolutely not.
- 
   
	2 RepliesHalo reach has decent multiplayer other than the abilities Still hate armor lock with a passion [spoiler]inb4 adapt[/spoiler]
- 
   
	1 ReplyEdited by Juice: 10/13/2016 1:48:31 AM[quote]balanced[/quote] lol Have you tried anything other than warzone?
- 
   
	1 ReplyI play Reach every now and then, it I've been using MCC for Halo recently. I tend I stick with Halo 2 of Halo 2A.
- 
   
	I'm sticking with Halo 5.
- 
   
	Love Reach, but the Rumble Pit playlist (my favorite) is always low on players.. :(
 
										 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
					 
		    