{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/29/2016 12:33:51 AM
4
clash is worst. no objective is objectively unobjective. EF that noise.
English
-
The objective is to kill them backkkk
-
That's the point. When the objective is simply to kill, it's a lot easier to play solo. While Fireteams will still have the advantage of communication, being on one won't automatically mean a win. [b][][][][/b]
-
Clash is the best to date for simple reasons. 1. No objective means randoms can play clash on clash instead of clash on control. 2. Shorter games 3. Shorter games = more games per hour 4. More games per hour = more loot 5. More loot = more happy players
-
I like it, I feel like it's more friendly to solos
