{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/10/2015 6:56:11 AM
1
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 3:44:55 PM[quote]False assumption is false.[/quote]Haha. Britton says I'm false without a reason. It's no wonder he was only able to develop four words for an attempt to be intimidating. *slow clap* Also:[spoiler]You don't believe in the Big Bang?[/spoiler]
-
You never asked my opinion on the matter of the big bang. You simply assumed incorrectly. Do you really think your terrible attempts at attacking my character will somehow invalidate any of the information I've shared in this forum? Because it won't.
-
You don't believe in the Big Bang?
-
Science doesn't require belief. I simoky observe discoveries as they occur, and adjust my world view accordingly.
-
Okay...? Do you consider the Big Bang to be under evidential truth?
-
No. I consider it to be something we are constantly learning more about.
-
...but it apparently doesn't feel that the scientists are getting anywhere with it except for the fact that they feel as if they should restate the origin repetitively: An atheistic scientist states, "In the beginning, a light exploded from nothing supernatural acting as the cause to which we have not yet any logical explanation, but we can assure the public that we are doing our daily head scratches to try our best to find out how the heck did we get here." *ends the "news" press conference*
-
Actually new discoveries are made all the time. If the reason for everything was "god did it" there would be no reason to even look for more answers. It doesn't matter that the fact we don't have a definite explanation for everything bothers you. That doesn't constitute or lend credit to religious or supernatural answers.
