{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Britton:
3/7/2015 11:49:32 PM
16
The big bang theory. How it's coming into question.
Here's the basic premise.
[quote] "The fact that there's a hot fireball at very early times: that is confirmed," Brandenberg told Live Science. "When you try to go back all the way to the singularity, that's when the problems arise." [/quote]
The article goes into how the new information is affecting what we thought we knew, and how and why our understanding is changing and growing.
[spoiler]I figured this was relevant since there was some ridiculous discussion about it. So here's some actual information. [/spoiler]
-
The Big Bang was very presumptuous and taken out of context to begin with and the evidence for the theory was never really proof of how the universe came into existence but was a better explanation for why the universe is expanding. The fact remains that the Big Bang did occur but the extent of its involvement and cause is very debatable.
-
4 RepliesBump for science!
-
2 RepliesBamp for science.
-
6 RepliesI think all this stuff comes into question. He'll we make movies about Stephen hawking and most of his ideas time and smarter people have proven wrong
-
10 RepliesIf matter cannot be created nor destroyed, then what happens to stuff that get sucked by a black hole?
-
Yes, let the scientist of the Flood figure this out.
-
Very interesting just wish I understood all of it heh
-
42 RepliesBut muh scientific theories are facts!
-
4 RepliesBermp
-
2 Replies<_< >_> [spoiler]it's*[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplyEdited by fraggumz: 3/7/2015 10:17:21 PMGood article We've known for a while that quantum and mechanical physics don't match up New discoveries are always exciting They other article, if you can call it that, claimed the big bang was "disproven by top scientists"
-
19 RepliesNegative laws of physics are nice because they explain how the universe behaves without calling the need of them existing as some kind of Platonian meta-physical object. And if you deny negative laws of physics at this point, then you're just an idiot. But what we need to figure out is an explanation for the four dimensions, in a simplistic and 'no-assumptions' manner just like negative laws of physics.
-
8 RepliesHey guys, I'm agnostic, but I don't really get how the Big Bang theory would work. How did that shit get there in the first place?
-
4 RepliesIn b4 theists start getting too excited
-
-
Scibump
