Does one now have to be a kid to rant on the internet? Once upon a time you weren't cool unless you were pissed off at something. The internet has bred this indifferent stoicism but it's just a front mostly, people are in fact quite starved for the opposite.
English
-
Just calling hypocrisy where I see it. No social commentary here.
-
It's not hypocrisy. Once again, learn what words mean. Hypocrisy would be me complaining about how they teabag and carry on and then in the very next match I go and do the same thing to my opponents. Did no-one else pass English in high school?
-
Hypocrisy would be a manchild calling other people children.
-
Good thing I'm neither a man, nor a child, huh?
-
Edited by TwigTwig: 8/6/2017 2:13:56 PM[quote]Good thing I'm neither a man, nor a child, huh?[/quote] You sure? We need a new derogatory term for an immature, whiney female. I'll get back to you.
-
Does being an arsehole just come naturally?
-
[quote]Does being an arsehole just come naturally?[/quote] I can't hear you through all that sobbing and wailing.
-
Why is it so hard for you people?
-
[quote]Why is it so hard for you people?[/quote] Can you cry any harder?
-
It must be a biological thing, or perhaps some defect. Were you dropped as a child?
-
[quote]It must be a biological thing, or perhaps some defect. Were you dropped as a child?[/quote] http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/newstalk1280.com/files/2014/04/crying-child-arnoaltix-630x419.jpg
-
No, I'd say the phenomenon definitely occurred in utero, where your case is concerned.
-
[quote]No, I'd say the phenomenon definitely occurred in utero, where your case is concerned.[/quote] Maybe if you weren't trash and had a positive k/d you wouldn't get bagged so much
-
have you checked my stats have you? character assassination is it now?
-
[quote]have you checked my stats have you? character assassination is it now?[/quote] Give you a 2/8, mainly because I can tell all this hate you're getting is actually getting to you. Rookie.
-
way to dodge my question there.
-
[quote]way to dodge my question there.[/quote] Seemed like a dumb question to me. Takes 2 clicks to see you die more than you kill, which is relevant to the tears in your OP. I'd bag you too, if I knew you were gonna have a breakdown on the forums.
-
And all your responses have been even less intelligent. Yet, I'm still courteous enough to reply to you.
-
Edited by TwigTwig: 8/6/2017 2:38:42 PM[quote]And all your responses have been even less intelligent. Yet, I'm still courteous enough to reply to you.[/quote] I thought I'd do you a favour and bump your lq bait. Your personal attacks just make this so much sweeter. Highlights how salty you're getting.
-
7 or so months ago, I had a better elo than you currently have in trials. I'll bet you also have the luxury of a dedicated fireteam to play with.
-
[quote]7 or so months ago, I had a better elo than you currently have in trials. I'll bet you also have the luxury of a dedicated fireteam to play with.[/quote] You have a 0.6 in Trials. If you had a 1900 elo at any point, you got carried. But you already know that, you're just crying louder.
-
On top of that, your win loss ratio is nearly 60% so you obviously spend all your time in fireteams in the crucible, and never solo queue. Of course that means your kd is going to be higher than someone who plays on their own all the time. I'll bet you and your friends get off on farming noobs for KD, right? Pathetic. I never had a 1900 elo. It was about 1300 before I took a long break from the game.
-
[quote]On top of that, your win loss ratio is nearly 60% so you obviously spend all your time in fireteams in the crucible, and never solo queue. Of course that means your kd is going to be higher than someone who plays on their own all the time. I'll bet you and your friends get off on farming noobs for KD, right? Pathetic. I never had a 1900 elo. It was about 1300 before I took a long break from the game.[/quote] But you just said you had a higher elo than I currently do. So are you just saying words? Random words that pop into your head?
-
yes. One thousand three hundred and sixty something is a higher number than 1300.
-
[quote]yes. One thousand three hundred and sixty something is a higher number than 1300.[/quote] My elo is 1935. You ARE just saying random words!