It would be nice if we could choose only singles or only 6-person fireteams as an option for matchmaking. I've been on both sides of that type of match and it rarely feels balanced and is often over quickly.
-
Skill based matchmaking and a ranking system would fix so many problems with this game. How did they not put this in when it was in a game they released 10 years ago?!
-
I thought there was an update they already did that made it more likely for pre-made fire teams to face other pre-made fire teams.
-
Mercenary mode is what we need.
-
1 ReplyIDk about being able to select off it, but Matchmakign SHOULD prioritize party size second after connections. If a group goes in with a group fo 6, they should at least being playing 2 groups of 3 each on nearly every match if the playerbase is there to make it happen.
-
As they should
-
Thats the whole point of TEAMS. Teamwork.
-
2 RepliesEveryone in this forumn should be using the team chat option..you know the one everyone cried about. Communicate.
-
I would love to see more variety in playlists especially a no super and playlists for control/clash with no 6 person teams.
-
Who woulda thunk that communication is key to success? Crazy talk!
-
And how often do you come across them? Almost never and when you do, you can go to orbit after the match and not see them again.
-
10 RepliesOrganized 6-man teams should win. They have mics to communicate, and usually know what they're doing. If you don't like 6v6, go play rumble or skirmish.
-
That there is in all games.
-
2 RepliesRumble...?
-
2 RepliesSounds like a good idea. I dont play much crucible and dont pretend to be good. I only really play for the exotic bounties. But ive been smashed by whole teams before which would really make it boring for both sides.
-
i think it really depends. Sometimes the 6 man fireteams are pretty bad. I had a decisive victory with randoms against a 6 man team all using the Vex in IB. I also had a match against a 6 man team that quit after about 2 minutes giving us an easy win.
-
Would be fun
-
Yeah mercenary mode would be a cool addition to the game for players just playing by themselves who don't want to deal with full fireteams
-
Man the only thing they need to fix is the constant lag everything else is fine with me. my winning rate is only 51% but idc cause I usually have the highest kill.
-
Well, I'm not going to stick around if we're getting slaughtered. I look for fireteamed groups, when I run solo, and will intentionally dip out before the match starts. I like a match that's somewhere closely balanced, not some anal fist-blam!- festival.
-
2 RepliesNo knock it off. You're gonna ruin pvp for everyone. It depends on the fire team. I've been solo and taken out full fire team with other solos. And vice versa.
-
11 RepliesEdited by Silvurphlame: 3/30/2015 1:19:30 AMIt's called Team [i]Voice[/i] Channel. (Left out part of the name.)
-
3 RepliesThis was a huge problem in Iron Banner too. I wouldn't mind your suggestions. Would even the playing field. By the way, how can you tell when your up against a Fireteam before the match starts?
-
1 ReplyYes. In Iron Banner we'd have a look at our opponents and 100% of the time we'd reck them if they were all solos or a few teams of 2. We'd be pushed harder with anyone team of 6, but it's literally 100% of the time that we'd absolutely smash the solos to the point it got boring. It's mostly due to communication - we'd shout out '2 going B', '3 on a', 'one-shot on B', etc etc. I agree there should be a solo mode and fireteam mode.
-
7 RepliesYou have some serious guts for posting something this stupid. Get over it. It's just a game. Everyone loses in something once in awhile.
-
Bump.
-
6 RepliesYou're crushing them, send them to the forums crying!